Is work in a nuclear power plant risky?

The Tribune

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Friday, February 12, 2010, Chandigarh, India

Is work in a nuclear power plant risky?
K S Parthasarathy
A 24 year old who is about to join the Department of Atomic Energy (DAE) as a scientific officer, is troubled by what he saw on a TV channel. He is unmarried; his parents are worried about the alleged damage to DNA by radiation. I assured him that there is no such harm. TV channels often go overboard and make unsubstantiated claims.
A 63 year old person asked me whether the throat malignancy, which, his 33 year old daughter is suffering from, is likely due to the possible radiation exposure he might have received while working in a nuclear power plant when he was 28 year old.
Thyroid diseases are not infrequent. No one knows for sure the reason for getting it. But there is no evidence that radiation exposure to father may lead to cancer in their children.
Workers in nuclear power plants will receive some radiation dose. Nuclear Power Corporation of India Limited (NPCIL) has instituted strict procedures to keep the doses to workers within the limits prescribed by the Atomic Energy Regulatory Board (AERB) and to values As Low As Reasonably Achievable (ALARA). Their radiation risk is insignificant.
ALARA committees with Chief Superintendents as chairmen, section heads as members and health physicists as member secretary review radiation work at each station periodically. Sectional ALARA committees plan work involving radiation exposures.
Each Station prepares a work plan, identifies various activities involving radiation exposure and gets AERB's approval for an annual “Radiation Budget”. If any Station exceeds the budget, AERB will not be amused!
The interior areas of the plant buildings are categorised into four zones for radiation and contamination control. Healthphysicists record radiation levels and airborne activity with prescribed frequency. Movement of every worker within the zones is controlled. Before entering Zone 2, 3 &4, they must wear lab coat, gloves and shoe covers and personnel dosimeters. They come out through sensitive portal monitors which will detect contamination, if any, present. They check hands and shoes using special monitors.
Annual reports published at (www.aerb.gov.in) indicate that the compliance with its stipulations is near total. For instance, during 2001 to 2008, among the annual average workforce of about 14,000 workers, one worker each in Rajasthan Atomic Power Station (RAPS) and Narora Atomic Power Station (NAPS) exceeded the limit in 2001; in 2002, one worker each in Madras Atomic PowerStation (MAPS) and NAPS; in 2007, two workers in NAPS exceeded the limits. This is indeed a creditable record.
Dose limits are based on conservative assumptions. It is inconsequential if any one receives, occasionally, a dose above the limit.
The Station managements made improvements in ventilation, reduced heavy water leakages, shielded hotspots, filtered crud from heat transport system, promptly detected and removed failed fuel bundles and used cobalt-free materials (Radiation from Cobalt-60, formed by actrivation of cobalt present in certain reactor components increases the radiation field). Many elegant engineering solutions helped to reduce radiation doses to workers.
Radiation protection standards assume that any dose of radiation, no matter how small, involves a possible risk to human health (World Nuclear Association, November 2009). After reviewing 200 peer-reviewed publications, Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) concluded that this methodology may have been over-estimating the risks. (World Nuclear News, December 2).
Radiation protection standards are based on studies by scholarly bodies such as the US National Academy of Sciences (NAS)’ Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Committee, the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) and United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). They indicate that at low doses, radiation risks, if there are any, are very small. Negligibly small risks are no risks at all. Work in a nuclear power plant is not a risky occupation.
The writer is Raja Ramanna Fellow, Department of Atomic Energy